Quantum Mechanics

Physicists are still stumped by the dilemma of quantum mechanics wherein electrons seem to operate as a wave form, yet we perceive them as particles. The reason, I believe, is simple.  This is not physics, but speculative cosmologies.

Subatomics describes the permeable medium by which energy in the implicate ("subtle") universe or realm -- where everything is a form of energy and would probably only be perceptible in wave-form -- crosses over into our presumably material realm.  In the implicate (a term coined by the physicist David Bohm) universe, this "form" wouldn't be a form at all but at most an archetype seen as an energy wave.  If we were in that realm with corresponding faculties, our perception of it would be as a fluid form of wave-like energy which may incline towards a pattern, or archetype, in a macro-sense, but would be an immaterial wave in the micro-sense.  A whorl or little mini-cyclone of energy, perhaps.

We, observing from this realm, perceive the subatomic as a particle because of where we are standing -- in the material universe.  Wave-forms tend to take on the appearance of solid shape here because the vibrational energy of this realm operates at a much slower rate than in the implicate or subtle realm.  Here, we can see, touch, taste, and feel apparent form in order to learn from it.  It's a hierarchical design whereby energy and implicate patterns are slowed down, slowed down, and slowed down until our primitive physical senses can perceive and thus interact with them.

There are several layers to Existence or Creation.  It's a bit like an onion. Each layer has a kind of physics and its own laws which operate accordingly therein but don't necessarily apply outside of that specific realm.  They do operate hierarchically, trans-causally.  That is, the laws of the lower, or outer realms, are subsumed within the laws of the upper or inner realms.  We've yet to have that explained to us in terms of physics.  Perhaps sometime in the future.

And so to the video.  Spoiler alert: I have a theory about nonlocality, which is mentioned later in the video, as well but will write about that at a later date.